Re: [PWE3] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chen-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-01.txt

"Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com> Mon, 19 September 2011 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <amalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3013121F8B57 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.276
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.277, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmBUb08OYzc2 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644AE21F8B53 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iaby26 with SMTP id y26so6118237iab.31 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DEMKXGN2+FM16f3heMhVbGDBBiy6chBldsixIw9mv0U=; b=njzJ1m8fYekVnlZB8ESmRJHzxriJYDsIc9VCkbbp0+nXNsuCfee5rfqq5c+XVCIoF9 wfwLA8I01QK3cCRNo65hdCcVFvXeWcOqL3NVydKQRUg9RjzW2+RCQ1T0NDeX5NYVMNV5 4Cno7yqACIrqk8zKfgIIixzYB3nYWNBVVENsE=
Received: by 10.42.72.132 with SMTP id o4mr3543096icj.97.1316402452245; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.225.3 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C67FC658-E6EE-4018-ABA2-AC40ECD706BE@cisco.com>
References: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE207D56875@SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com> <C67FC658-E6EE-4018-ABA2-AC40ECD706BE@cisco.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:20:32 +0800
Message-ID: <CAK+d4xtTaU=fFXoY8o1f1wLn0t3Mi9pzUR5gqTiw6Xp=KC5sbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chen-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-01.txt
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:18:31 -0000

Carlos,

Thanks for the notice to the PWE3 list. Just speaking for myself, this
looks like a very useful draft.

Cheers,
Andy

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
<cpignata@cisco.com> wrote:
> PWE3ers,
> FYI, as this I-D targets the MPLS WG for a home but is relevant to PWE3 as
> it defines LSP Ping IPv6 PW target FEC types.
> Please send your comments to the MPLS list.
> Thanks!
>
> Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro.
> Excuze typofraphicak errows
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
> Date: September 19, 2011 6:58:48 AM GMT+05:30
> To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
> Cc: "ppan@infinera.com" <ppan@infinera.com>, "rajiva@cisco.com"
> <rajiva@cisco.com>, "cpignata@cisco.com" <cpignata@cisco.com>
> Subject: RE: New Version Notification for
> draft-chen-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-01.txt
>
> Hi,
>
> We submitted a new draft that updates RFC4379 to explicitly constraint the
> existing PW FEC sub-TLVs for IPv4 LDP sessions, and extends Pseudowire LSP
> Ping (by defining two new LSP Ping sub-TLVs for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs) to the
> IPv6 scenario where an IPv6 LDP session is used to signal the Pseudowire
> (i.e., where the Sender's and Receiver's IP addresses are IPv6 addresses.)
>
> We'd appreciate that you could spend some time to read the draft
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-01 ) and give
> your comments!
>
> Thanks,
> Mach
>
> ----Original Message-----
>
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 11:08 AM
>
> To: Mach Chen
>
> Cc: ppan@infinera.com; rajiva@cisco.com; Mach Chen; cpignata@cisco.com
>
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-chen-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-01.txt
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-chen-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-01.txt has been
>
> successfully submitted by Mach(Guoyi) Chen and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
> Filename:     draft-chen-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping
>
> Revision:     01
>
> Title:         Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs
>
> Creation date:     2011-08-16
>
> WG ID:         Individual Submission
>
> Number of pages: 9
>
> Abstract:
>
>   Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping
>
>   and Traceroute mechanisms are commonly used to detect and isolate
>
>   data plane failures in all MPLS LSPs including Pseudowire (PW) LSPs.
>
>   The PW LSP Ping and Traceroute elements, however, are not specified
>
>   for IPv6 address usage.
>
>   Specifically, the Pseudowire FEC sub-TLVs for the Target FEC Stack in
>
>   the LSP Ping and Traceroute mechanism are implicitly defined only for
>
>   IPv4 Provider Edge (PEs) routers, and are not applicable for the case
>
>   where PEs use IPv6 addresses.  There is, additionally, a degree of
>
>   potential ambiguity in the specification of these sub-TLVs since the
>
>   address family is not explicitly specified but it is to be inferred
>
>   from the sub-TLV length.
>
>   This document updates RFC4379 to explicitly constraint these existing
>
>   PW FEC sub-TLVs for IPv4 LDP sessions, and extends Pseudowire LSP
>
>   Ping to the IPv6 scenario where an IPv6 LDP session is used to signal
>
>   the Pseudowire (i.e., where the Sender's and Receiver's IP addresses
>
>   are IPv6 addresses.)  This is done by defining two new LSP Ping sub-
>
>   TLVs for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs.
>
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>
>